Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 01:47
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Matted Dog Lived Alone On A Rooftop For Years — Then Hope Arrived - The Dodo - For Animal People
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Has anyone ever participated in a gang bang and what was it like?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Eos iste et tenetur sunt rerum eligendi.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
Red Cross says at least 21 killed and dozens shot in Gaza aid incident - BBC
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Israel launches several attacks on Beirut’s southern suburbs, south Lebanon - Al Jazeera